Teaching
Resiliency to our Children
Affirming and teaching resiliency, the capacity to "bounce back" in the face of acute crisis or chronic stress, can help us assist children who are struggling amid life's challenges. The presence of risk factors at home, at school, and in the community does not automatically mean a child will fall into negative or destructive behavior patterns. In fact, if the resiliency of the child is supported by building on the critical developmental "assets,", the child may thrive despite the presence of risk factors.
|
40 Developmental Assets for Children The Search Institute
has identified the following building blocks of healthy |
||||
|
The
40 Developmental Assets pages may be reproduced for educational, noncommercial
uses only. Copyright © 1997 by Search Institute, 700 S. Third Street,
Suite 210, Minneapolis, MN 55415; 800-888-7828;
http://www.search-institute.org. |
||||
In the book "The Resilient Self," Stephen and Sylvia Wolin identified the following traits of resiliency.
Traits
of Resilient Individuals
Seven traits of adults who survived a troubled childhood:
Traits
of Resilient Families
Families that cope well under stress create a climate of optimism, resourcefulness,
and nurturing which parallels the traits of resilient individuals. Research
on family strengths suggests the following traits of resilient families:
As with individual research, there is no consensus on what constitutes a resilient family. In general, families who demonstrate one or more of the traits mentioned above are more likely to be adaptive (i.e., make constructive changes, avoid destructive conflict, persevere under stressful circumstances).
Community
Strengths
Healthy Communities, Healthy Youth present a vision of community strengths:
They suggest community health is reflected by:
1) community norms regarding issues such as adult alcohol use and concern about youth;
2) institutional policies as reflected in a funding priority for education and youth activities, and in the presence of a functioning community coordinating committee for youth issues; and
3) specific youth outcome measures, including reduction in teen pregnancy and school dropout rates, and increased involvement in community service. The Community Assets Model emphasizes the import of youth ideas and action in changing risk conditions.
Availability of structured activities does make a difference, directly as competence-building,
and indirectly in providing alternatives to violence and vandalism or encouraging
positive peer role models. In addition, families, especially those under high
stress and most at-risk, cannot be expected to insulate and nurture children
alone. It truly takes a whole village to raise a child. Children need support
from adults, both outside of the family and within.
Affirming strengths, even in the most difficult circumstances, is the foundation of resiliency assessment and philosophy. For individuals, persistence, optimism, and creative problem solving are significant assets. Cohesion and conflict resolution are critical family strengths, while support networks and collective problem solving characterize resilient communities.
Programming should prioritize preventive, competence-building activities, since avoiding risks and building on strengths is less expensive and complex than intervening after problems occur or intensify. As youth and families internalize positive attitudes and skills, they use existing assets to shape their own future.
Evaluations of youth programs also indicate that programs should be as holistic as possible, addressing a variety of needs (physical, intellectual, spiritual) rather than focusing only on one, and maximizing collaborative efforts rather than offering fragmented programs.
This information has been adapted from:
PRACTICE WISDOM
The Resiliency Paradigm: A Critical Tool for Practitioners
Ben Silliman, University of Wyoming Cooperative Extension Service
Human Development and Family Life Bulletin
A Review of Research and Practice
Volume 4, Issue 1, Spring 1998
References
Abbott, Douglas A. and William
Meredith. (1988). Characteristics of strong families: Perceptions of ethnic
parents. Home Economics Research Journal, 17, (2), 140-147.
Anatovsky, Aaron. (1987). Unravelling the mystery of health: How people manage
stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Baldwin, A. L., C. Baldwin, and R. E. Cole. (1990). Stress-resistant families
and stress-resistant children. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Chichetti, K. H.
Neuchterlein, and S. Weintraub. (Eds.). Risk and protective factors in the development
of psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257-280.
Bernard, Bonnie. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in
the family, school, and community. Western Regional Center for Drug-free Schools
and Communities.
Blyth, Dale A. and Roelkepartian, Eugene C. (1993). Healthy communities, healthy
youth. Minneapolis: Search Institute.
Bogenschneider, Karen, Stephen Small, and David Riley. (1993). An ecological,
risk-focused approach for addressing youth-at-risk. Chevy Chase, MD: National
4-H Center.
Garbarino, James. (1992). Children and families in the social environment. Second
Edition. New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
Klohnen, Eva C., Elizabeth A. Vandewater, and Amy Young. (1996). Negotiating
the middle years: Ego-resiliency and successful midlife adjustment in women.
Psychology and Aging, 11, (3), 431-442.
Kretzmann, John P. and John L. McKnight, (1993). Building communities from the
inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a communities assets. Evanston,
IL: Northwestern University.
Masten, Ann D., Karin M. Best, and Norman Garmezy. (1990). Resilience and development:
Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development
and Psychopathology, 2, 425-444.
McCubbin, Hamilton I. and Marilyn A. McCubbin. (1988). Typologies of resilient
families: Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity. Family Relations, 37,
(3), 247-254.
McCubbin, Hamilton I., Marilyn A. McCubbin, and Anne I. Thompson. (1993). Resiliency
in families: The role of family schema and appraisal in family adaptation to
crisis. In T. H. Brubaker. (Ed.). Family Relations: Challenges for the Future.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Olson, David H., Candyce S. Russell, and Douglas H. Sprenkle. (1989). Circumplex
model: Systematic assessment and treatment of families. New York, NY: Haworth
Press.
Reiss, David. (1981). The families construction of reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Stinnett, Nick, Greg Sanders, John DeFrain, and Anne Parkhurst. (1982). A nationwide
study of families who perceive themselves as strong. Family Perspective, 16,
(1), 15-22.
Werner, Emmy E. and Ruth S. Smith. (1992). Overcoming the odds. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Wolin, Steven and Sybil Wolin. (1993). The resilient self. New York, NY: Villiard
Books.
Source: Human Development & Family Life Bulletin, 1998, Volume 4 (1), 4-5.
|
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A2ZGORGE.INFO © COPYRIGHT 2003-2005 - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||